Garmin Impact Load Distance vs Actual Distance: My 7.57 km Run After 40

I have been running on and off for about five years, but today feels like Day 1 of a new start.

This time, I want to run more consistently, understand my Garmin data, and learn how my body responds to each run after 40.

Yesterday evening, I went for a run with my Garmin watch.

Here is the key Garmin data from my 7.57 km evening run.

CategoryMetricMy Data
Run SummaryActual Distance7.57 km
Run SummaryImpact Load Distance10.06 km
Run SummaryTotal Time42:03
Run SummaryMoving Time41:56
Run SummaryAverage Pace5:33 /km
Run SummaryBest Pace4:01 /km
Effort & LoadAverage Heart Rate151 bpm
Effort & LoadMax Heart Rate163 bpm
Effort & LoadTraining EffectTempo
Effort & LoadAerobic Effect3.5
Effort & LoadAnaerobic Effect0.2
Effort & LoadTraining Load118
Running DynamicsAverage Cadence173 spm
Running DynamicsMax Cadence188 spm
Running DynamicsStride Length1.03 m
Running DynamicsVertical Ratio8.4%
Running DynamicsVertical Oscillation8.6 cm
Running DynamicsGround Contact Time257 ms
EnvironmentAverage Temperature26°C
EnvironmentEstimated Sweat Loss700 ml

Key takeaway:

My actual distance was 7.57 km, but my impact load distance was 10.06 km. This made me think that the run placed more stress on my body than the distance alone suggested.

The number that caught my attention the most was the difference between my actual distance and my impact load distance.

At first, I thought these two numbers should be similar. But after looking at the data, I started to think about them differently.

The actual distance tells me how far I moved.

The impact load distance seems to tell me more about how much stress my body experienced during the run.

This was interesting because the run did not feel like a simple easy jog.

My average pace was 5:33 per kilometer, and my average heart rate was 151 bpm. Garmin also marked the training effect as tempo, with an aerobic effect of 3.5 and an anaerobic effect of 0.2.

That means this run was mostly an aerobic workout, but it still gave my body a solid training load.

As a runner in my 40s, I do not want to look only at distance or pace.

A 7 km run can feel very different depending on my heart rate, cadence, running form, fatigue, temperature, and recovery.

In this run, my average cadence was 173 spm, my ground contact time was 257 ms, and my vertical ratio was 8.4%.

I am still learning what these numbers really mean for my body.

But one thing is clear to me:

Running after 40 is not just about running faster or farther.

It is also about understanding how my body reacts to each run.

My simple takeaway from this run is this:

Actual distance shows how far I ran.
Impact load distance helps me think about how hard the run may have been on my body.

Next time, I want to pay attention to three things:

running more smoothly,
landing more softly,
and checking how my body feels after the run.

I am not a professional runner or a running coach.

This is my personal running note as a beginner runner in my 40s, learning how to build consistency and understand Garmin data one run at a time.

Leave a comment

© 2026 Running After 40

Privacy Policy | Affiliate Disclosure